Fans will have to pay even more and watch more commercials.
The NBA plans
to sign a new TV contract worth $75 billion over nine years. The new agreement
is expected to add $8.3 billion to the league's budget each year, which is $5.7
billion more than the current contract, Forbes writes, citing its league
sources. In that case, if the NBA and the players' union do not artificially
restrain the growth of the salary ceiling in the coming seasons, its value
could rise to $171 million by 2025. Last season, the salary ceiling was $109.1
million. For the 2021/22 season, the league raised it to $112.4 million. Let's
try to figure out where this is going. For players, owners and viewers.
300 million for superstars
The NBA had
its previous TV contract with ESPN and Turner Network Television in 2014. The
numbers seemed scary then: $24 billion over nine years (starting with the
2016/17 season). Some pundits said thanks to the late David Stern, who was able
to take the NBA to such a cosmic level. Others were indignant: where did that
money come from and how do we get it back? It turned out to be OK. It gave the
league a serious profit and, as a consequence, a huge jump in salaries
followed. As a reminder, players' salaries are built from the revenue the NBA
earns. Not a fixed amount, but exactly what is earned. In the 2015/16 season,
the salary ceiling increased by 24 million. That's just over 20%. The players'
union got in on the act. There was talk of a 3% increase for players, but 3% of
24 billion is 720 million.
One of the best parts of the game is its popularity around the globe.
— SLAM (@SLAMonline) September 22, 2021
HBD to the late David Stern. He helped make that happen. pic.twitter.com/g6e0nn2i9C
A new
contract was a matter of time. The example of the National Football League
(NFL), which had an even bigger TV rights deal, $113 billion over 11 years, is
before my eyes. The NBA would have a slightly more modest $75 billion over nine
years.
With this
potential contract, the salary ceiling would be set at 170-171 million. That's
outrageous. You used to be able to buy a club for that kind of money. This
would give even more room for teams to maneuver, and player salaries would
increase insanely. The clubs' bid will likely expand from 16 to 17, as the
players' union loves to increase its "presence" in any activity. For
sure, serious players will be counting so that their contracts come to an end
just in time for 2025, so that they can get the next supermax.
Throwback to the start of something GOOD… 👀 #CurryBrand pic.twitter.com/v97ODjTvzt
— Stephen Curry (@StephenCurry30) November 5, 2021
Naturally,
the maximum contracts will reach 300 million. The 200+ million contracts, which
are the biggest right now, will not look serious. Trey Young and Luka Doncic
could get the next five-year, $300 million contracts. In 2025, the Summersmacks
will be up to 60 million a year. That is, if a man signs a five-year supermax,
he will get 300 million graded at 53 for the first year, 58 for the second, 60
for the third, 62 for the fourth, 67 for the fifth. What's more, Stephen Curry
can claim his third (!) supermax. He was previously the first athlete in
history to receive two consecutive $200 million contracts.
Wiretaps and subsidies
The role of
megastars will increase even more. They will have power in their hands that has
nothing to do with being very cool. They will be required to be paid. This is
the kind of story where if you're a club owner, you can't not pay. After all,
clubs are obligated to spend 50 percent of their revenue on player salaries.
Someone the general manager or president will be able to negotiate with. And
some will have to adjust.
General
managers will have to analyze their strategies even more deeply. Even now, they
must have entire departments calculate the possible salary expectations of top
players. So that by 2025 they can calculate who to pay and how much.
Clearly,
LeBron James will be done by then. Russell Westbrook and Anthony Davis, for
example, will still be in their prime. So you can build a team now, put it
together on paper for a new TV contract.
Ben Simmons and Rich Paul when people think the fines will make Ben play pic.twitter.com/b32QyyAxwo
— NBA Memes (@NBAMemes) October 2, 2021
Shark agents
like Rich Paul, Mark Bertelstein, Jeff Schwartz, Aaron Mintz are already
calculating how to get their clients in the right "condition" by
2025, how to raise the most money possible for them. But it's not that simple.
There are no fools in the NBA leadership.
They'll probably tighten
the rules around tamping and tanking even more, with the player communicating
with teams (or representatives) before they're officially allowed to negotiate.
It might even come down to wiretaps. So, of course, collusion between players
or players of the same agent will be strictly suppressed. It is possible that
there will be a limit on the number of players from one agent on one team.
The reason for the
opposition from the NBA is clear. No one in the league wants to create the
conditions for a dynasty team in the NBA. The worst-case scenario for the NBA
in principle is three or more championship wins for one team. Perennially weak
markets like Minnesota or Detroit would lose even more importance. There would
be another need for subsidies, as was the case recently with New Orleans. It
would look interesting to punish not only with rubles (dollars), but with the
removal of points (in the case of the NBA, the removal of wins, since there is
no counting of points for wins).
More advertising and more TV power
What do
the contracts bring to the end consumer? First, increased cable fees for
viewers. Second, more games on national television. The fight for time and for
viewers hasn't been undone. Third, a more flexible game schedule, as we will
have to adjust even more to television. TV will dictate game kickoff times, not
the NBA.
Fourth,
compromises will have to be made to show in Asia. Fifth, there will be even
more advertising. Sixth, and most importantly, all of this will give technology
a boost. In terms of product design, there should be a qualitative leap.
It is
already known that the league will hold an annual TV show at the end of the
season. Naturally, the women's NBA will get its fair share of national
television coverage. It is likely that the Developmental League will also get
some.
The teams
and their owners in this situation will be placed in a new framework and will
face new challenges. There will be an increase in all team maintenance and
business costs. Will these contract proceeds be enough to cover those costs?
Time will determine.